- Indwelling Spirit ~ A Blog for LGBTQ Christians - http://indwellingspirit.org -

Change looks like this!

Posted By Pastor Dan On August 4, 2010 @ 16:54 In Lesbian/Gay Marriage, LGBT Rights, Public Affairs | No Comments

Reaction has been swift to Judge Vaughn Walker’s sweeping decision that California’s Proposition 8 is unconstitutional because it violates both the equal protection and due process clauses of the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment.

[1] saltlakex-large.jpg

But it is “all the usual suspects” who have weighed in during the last few hours — the Roman Catholic Bishops, the Mormons, the “Family Research Council” and the attorneys who “defended” Prop 8 in Walker’s federal court.

It is interesting that–in Judge Walker’s view and in the eyes of most independent observers—because the defenders of Proposition 8 made such a weak defense of the proposition, their official statements this afternoon do not take issue with Walker’s legal reasoning or conclusions, but instead try to throw the whole case back into the court of public opinion even while they vow to send the appeal to the 9th Circuit Court.

[2] perryv500.jpg

The public opinion, of course, to which Alliance Defense Fund’s attorney Austin Nimrocks and attorney Andrew Pugno refer, is that the people voted for Prop 8 just as they had voted for Proposition 22 a decade ago. This is from the L.A. Now site of the Los Angeles Times:

Austin R. Nimocks, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund who fought to uphold Proposition 8 in Walker’s court, said they would appeal. “We’re obviously disappointed that the judge did not uphold the will of over 7 million Californians who made a decision in a free and fair democratic process.”Nimocks added that “tens of millions of Americans across this country” as well as Congress have expressed the belief that marriage should be limited to heterosexual couples. “To say that there is no reason whatsoever to define marriage as one man and one woman is not something that we expect to be upheld on appeal,” he said of Walker’s reasoning.Andrew P. Pugno, one of the lawyers who defended the Proposition 8 campaign in the trial in Walker’s San Francisco courtroom, referred comment on the judge’s decision to a spokeswoman for ProtectMarriage.com, who said the group opposed to gay marriage would later post a statement on its website. More than an hour after the ruling was issued, the group had yet to comment on it.

conclusionsoflaw-500.jpg

Walker’s “Conclusions of Law” [beginning on page 109] in contrast, quickly dispense with the popular vote and cite legal precedent that fundamental rights are not subject to the vote of the people.  Here are more stories and commentary:

The State Column “Prop 8 Ruling: Ban is Unconstitutional” [3] www.thestatecolumn.com/blog/2010/08/prop-8-ruling-ban-is-unconstitutional/

The Wall Street Journal [4] http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/08/04/breaking-news-sf-judge-shoots-down-proposition-8/Now 

Now Public [5] www.nowpublic.com/world/prop-8-ruled-unconstitutional-protests-celebration-2647312.html US District Judge Vaughn Walker Rules Proposition 8 Unconstitutional”

USA Today : Faith & Reason [6] http://content.usatoday.com/communities/Religion/post/2010/08/prop-8-proposition-8-california-gay-marriage-vaugh-walker/1 ”Prop 8 ruling drives strong religious reactions: Outrage to joy”

The Washington Post On Faith : Religion Roundup [7] http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2010/08/proposition_8_ruling_in_california_religion_roundup.html ”Proposition 8 ruling in California: religion roundup”

Los Angeles Times “L.A. Now / Southern California —This Just In [8] http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/08/gay-marriage-foes-vow-to-appeal-prop-8-ruling.html ”Gay marriage foes vow to appeal Prop. 8 ruling [Updated 3:00 pm]”

— Pastor Dan Hooper


Article printed from Indwelling Spirit ~ A Blog for LGBTQ Christians: http://indwellingspirit.org

URL to article: http://indwellingspirit.org/2010/08/04/change-looks-like-this/

URLs in this post:
[1] Image: http://indwellingspirit.org/2010/08/04/change-looks-like-this/saltlakex-largejpg
/

[2] Image: http://indwellingspirit.org/2010/08/04/change-looks-like-this/perryv500jpg/
[3] www.thestatecolumn.com/blog/2010/08/prop-8-ruling-ban-is-unconstitutional/: http://www.thestatecolumn.com/blog/2010/08/prop-8-ruling-ban-is-unconstitutional
/

[4] http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/08/04/breaking-news-sf-judge-shoots-down-proposition-8/Now: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/08/04/breaking-news-sf-judge-shoots-down-propositi
on-8/

[5] www.nowpublic.com/world/prop-8-ruled-unconstitutional-protests-celebration-2647312.html: http://www.nowpublic.com/world/prop-8-ruled-unconstitutional-protests-celebratio
n-2647312.html

[6] http://content.usatoday.com/communities/Religion/post/2010/08/prop-8-proposition-8-california-gay-marriage-vaugh-walker/1: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/Religion/post/2010/08/prop-8-proposition
-8-california-gay-marriage-vaugh-walker/1

[7] http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2010/08/proposition_8_ruling_in_california_religion_roundup.html: http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2010/08/proposition_8_ruling
_in_california_religion_roundup.html

[8] http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/08/gay-marriage-foes-vow-to-appeal-prop-8-ruling.html: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/08/gay-marriage-foes-vow-to-appeal-pr
op-8-ruling.html

Click here to print.